Reviews for NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite by Giorgio Maone
Response by Giorgio Maone
Developer response
posted 7 years ago"I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible".
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
2,363 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18989716, 6 hours ago
- I really wanted to use NoScript. I prefer single-purpose extensions that focus on doing one job well, compared to more multi-purpose extensions like uBlock Origin.
However, I ultimately couldn't stick with it because the user experience did not suit my needs.
E.g. one mobile screen presents around 12 different icons packed into the height of 3 lines of text, leaving a large portion of the screen completely empty below them.
My main frustration is that none of these icons have labels. Expecting users to learn and memorize the meaning of a dozen different unlabeled symbols creates an unnecessary barrier to entry and makes using the extension quickly and efficiently very difficult. It feels counter-intuitive to leave so much screen real estate blank when that space could be used to label each icon and explain its function.
uBlock Origin is easier to use than NoScript. - Rated 5 out of 5by LittleFire, 6 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Absinthe, 7 days ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by thofree, 12 days agoGets detected by Youtube's anti ad-block stuff. Wish you had a button to turn it off easily for a website without disabling it entirely.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 18920843, 12 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18315395, 24 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by VonD68, 24 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by luis, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Retromania, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Luciano Rangel, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18924473, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18903740, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 15309210, 2 months agoSimply top. I've been using the extension for years and I'm still delighted with it. I can control exactly which website is allowed to do what.
- Rated 5 out of 5by FireZilla, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Brutto WP, 2 months ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Ying Go, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 9771322, 2 months agoУ кого отключились дополнения обновите Firefox до 136 версии.
_____________________
For those who have been disabled add-ons, update Firefox to version 136. - Rated 5 out of 5by GothGlamPrincess, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by test, 2 months ago